懂英语还有法律的高人ButlerMachineToolCovEx-Cell-OCorp(England)(1979)Theclaimantsofferedtosupplyamachinetooltothedefendantsfor￡75,535.However,thequotationincludedatermwhichwouldentitlethesellerstoincreasethis

Question

懂英语还有法律的高人Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-Cell-O Corp(England) (1979)
The claimants offered to supply a machine tool to the defendants for ￡75,535.However,the quotation included a term which would entitle the sellers to increase this price (price-variation clause).The defendants accepted the offer on their own standard terms which did not provide for any variation of their quoted price.The claimants acknowledged the order.When the machine was delivered,the claimants claimed an extra ￡2,892 which the defendants refused to pay.The Court of Appeal held that the defendants had not unconditionally accepted the original offer.They had made a courter-offer which had been accepted by the claimant.The defendants' terms governed the contract.The claimants' action to recover the increase in price,therefore,failed.要求：description of the fact；the main legal issues and arguments and the decision in the case,写中文就好了,最好给我翻一下这个案例的意思

Answer 1

原告向被告（机床供应商）提出75,535英镑的索赔.然而,报价包含了一个术语,卖方可以有权提高这一价格（价格变动条款）.各被告接受了他们自己的标准术语,却没有告知原告报价已经变动.当机器被交付时,索赔人（原告）声称拒绝支付额外的2892英镑给被告.上诉法院认为,被告并没有无条件地接受了最初的报价.他们提出了一个价格变动范围,该范围是由索赔人所接受.被告的是按照合同条款执行的.驳回原告的诉讼请求.败诉.