早教吧作业答案频道 -->英语-->
谁有关于价值观的英语作文?我急用!最好是发言稿,适合本科水平用的!
题目详情
谁有关于价值观的英语作文?我急用!
最好是发言稿,适合本科水平用的!
最好是发言稿,适合本科水平用的!
▼优质解答
答案和解析
Think Win-Win
Habit 4
Win/Win is one of six total philosophies of human interaction.
Win/Win - People can seek mutual benefit in all human interactions. Principle-based behavior.
Win/Lose - The competitive paradigm: if I win, you lose. The leadership style is authoritarian. In relationships, if both people aren't winning, both are losing.
Lose/Win - The "Doormat" paradigm. The individual seeks strength from popularity based on acceptance. The leadership style is permissiveness. Living this paradigm can result in psychosomatic illness from repressed resentment.
Lose/Lose - When people become obsessed with making the other person lose, even at their own expense. This is the philosophy of adversarial conflict, war, or of highly dependent persons. (If nobody wins, being a loser isn't so bad.)
Win - Focusing solely on getting what one wants, regardless of the needs of others.
Win/Win or No Deal - If we can't find a mutually beneficial solution, we agree to disagree agreeably - no deal. This approach is most realistic at the beginning of a business relationship or enterprise. In a continuing relationship, it's no longer an option.
The most appropriate model depends on the situation. When relationships are paramount, Win/Win is the only viable alternative. In a competitive situation where building a relationship isn't important, Win/Lose may be appropriate. There are five dimensions of the Win/Win model: Character, Relationships, Agreements, Supportive Systems and Processes.
Character is the foundation of Win/Win. There must be integrity in order to establish trust in the relationship and to define a win in terms of personal values. A key trait is the abundance mentality that there is plenty for everybody (v. the Scarcity Mentality). The abundance mentality flows from a deep inner sense of personal worth and security.
Relationships are the focus on Win/Win. Whatever the orientation of the person you are dealing with (Win/Lose, etc.), the relationship is the key to turning the situation around. When there is a relationship of trust and emotional bank account balances are high, there is a much greater probability of a successful, productive interaction. Negative energy focused on differences in personality or position is eliminated; positive, cooperative energy focused on understanding and resolving issues is built.
Performance agreements or partnership agreements give definition and direction to Win/Win,. They shift the paradigm of production from vertical (Superior - Subordinate) to horizontal (Partnership/Team). The agreement should include elements to create a standard by which people can measure their own success.
Defined results (not methods) - what is to be done and when.
Guidelines - the parameters within which the results should be accomplished
Resources - human, financial, technical or organizational support available to accomplish the results.
Accountability - the standards of performance and time(s) of evaluation.
Consequences - what will happen as a result of the evaluation.
The agreement may be written by the employee to the manager to confirm the understanding.
Developing Win/Win performance agreements is the central activity of management, enabling employers to manage themselves within the framework of the agreement. Then the manager can initiate action and resolve obstacles so employees can do their jobs.
There are four kinds of consequences that management or parents can control - Financial, Psychic, Opportunity and Responsibility. In addition to personal consequences, the organizational consequences of behaviors should be identified.
The Reward System is a key element in the Win/Win model. Talking Win/Win but rewarding Win/Lose results in negating the Win/Win paradigm. If the outstanding performance of a few is rewarded, the other team members will be losers. Instead, develop individual achievable goals and team objectives to be rewarded.
Competition has its place against market competitors, last year's performance, or another location or individual where cooperation and interdependence aren't required, but cooperation in the workplace is as important to free enterprise as competition in the marketplace. The spirit of Win/Win cannot survive in an environment of competition or contests. All of the company's systems should be based on the principle of Win/Win. The Compensation system of the managers should be based on the productivity and development of their people. Reward both P (production) and PC (building production capacity).
The Win/Win process has four steps.
See the problem from the other point of view, in terms of the needs and concerns of the other party.
Identify the key issues and concerns (not positions) involved.
Determine what results would make a fully acceptable solution.
Identify new options to achieve those results.
You can only achieve Win/Win solutions with Win/Win procedures. Win/Win is not a personality technique. It's a total paradigm of human interaction.
Habit 4
Win/Win is one of six total philosophies of human interaction.
Win/Win - People can seek mutual benefit in all human interactions. Principle-based behavior.
Win/Lose - The competitive paradigm: if I win, you lose. The leadership style is authoritarian. In relationships, if both people aren't winning, both are losing.
Lose/Win - The "Doormat" paradigm. The individual seeks strength from popularity based on acceptance. The leadership style is permissiveness. Living this paradigm can result in psychosomatic illness from repressed resentment.
Lose/Lose - When people become obsessed with making the other person lose, even at their own expense. This is the philosophy of adversarial conflict, war, or of highly dependent persons. (If nobody wins, being a loser isn't so bad.)
Win - Focusing solely on getting what one wants, regardless of the needs of others.
Win/Win or No Deal - If we can't find a mutually beneficial solution, we agree to disagree agreeably - no deal. This approach is most realistic at the beginning of a business relationship or enterprise. In a continuing relationship, it's no longer an option.
The most appropriate model depends on the situation. When relationships are paramount, Win/Win is the only viable alternative. In a competitive situation where building a relationship isn't important, Win/Lose may be appropriate. There are five dimensions of the Win/Win model: Character, Relationships, Agreements, Supportive Systems and Processes.
Character is the foundation of Win/Win. There must be integrity in order to establish trust in the relationship and to define a win in terms of personal values. A key trait is the abundance mentality that there is plenty for everybody (v. the Scarcity Mentality). The abundance mentality flows from a deep inner sense of personal worth and security.
Relationships are the focus on Win/Win. Whatever the orientation of the person you are dealing with (Win/Lose, etc.), the relationship is the key to turning the situation around. When there is a relationship of trust and emotional bank account balances are high, there is a much greater probability of a successful, productive interaction. Negative energy focused on differences in personality or position is eliminated; positive, cooperative energy focused on understanding and resolving issues is built.
Performance agreements or partnership agreements give definition and direction to Win/Win,. They shift the paradigm of production from vertical (Superior - Subordinate) to horizontal (Partnership/Team). The agreement should include elements to create a standard by which people can measure their own success.
Defined results (not methods) - what is to be done and when.
Guidelines - the parameters within which the results should be accomplished
Resources - human, financial, technical or organizational support available to accomplish the results.
Accountability - the standards of performance and time(s) of evaluation.
Consequences - what will happen as a result of the evaluation.
The agreement may be written by the employee to the manager to confirm the understanding.
Developing Win/Win performance agreements is the central activity of management, enabling employers to manage themselves within the framework of the agreement. Then the manager can initiate action and resolve obstacles so employees can do their jobs.
There are four kinds of consequences that management or parents can control - Financial, Psychic, Opportunity and Responsibility. In addition to personal consequences, the organizational consequences of behaviors should be identified.
The Reward System is a key element in the Win/Win model. Talking Win/Win but rewarding Win/Lose results in negating the Win/Win paradigm. If the outstanding performance of a few is rewarded, the other team members will be losers. Instead, develop individual achievable goals and team objectives to be rewarded.
Competition has its place against market competitors, last year's performance, or another location or individual where cooperation and interdependence aren't required, but cooperation in the workplace is as important to free enterprise as competition in the marketplace. The spirit of Win/Win cannot survive in an environment of competition or contests. All of the company's systems should be based on the principle of Win/Win. The Compensation system of the managers should be based on the productivity and development of their people. Reward both P (production) and PC (building production capacity).
The Win/Win process has four steps.
See the problem from the other point of view, in terms of the needs and concerns of the other party.
Identify the key issues and concerns (not positions) involved.
Determine what results would make a fully acceptable solution.
Identify new options to achieve those results.
You can only achieve Win/Win solutions with Win/Win procedures. Win/Win is not a personality technique. It's a total paradigm of human interaction.
看了谁有关于价值观的英语作文?我急...的网友还看了以下:
文学的意义于作用是什么?文学几大意义 几大作用 要求逻辑严密! 2020-05-16 …
关于商品价值和使用价值的说法,正确的是( )。A.使用价值是价值的物质承担者B.只要具有使用价值就 2020-05-30 …
关于支配价格运动的规律,正确的说法有( )。 A.由于价值是价格的基础,所以价格与价值 2020-06-07 …
燃烧皿是啥玩意,作用是什么?今天做作业时遇到的,燃烧皿等于蒸发皿吗,如果不等于,作用是什么? 2020-07-02 …
如果用图反映产能过剩,从马克思的劳动价值论出发,对该图的正确解读是:()A.产能过剩行业的商品供过 2020-07-06 …
马克思主义基本原理概论多项选择题11、下列关于价值和使用价值的表述,正确的有()。A.使用价值是商品 2020-11-02 …
英语翻译样品已经在准备中.关于价格是否变更,需要等到做完样品后才能告知. 2020-11-16 …
下列关于商品二因素的说法正确的是()A.价值是使用价值的物质承担者B.使用价值是价值的物质承担者C. 2020-12-31 …
还是关于阶梯用电的问题上个问题的答案我已经了解了,基本电价,也就是第一档电价用完后,再次去就是第二档 2021-01-01 …
下列关于使用价值与价值的表述,正确的有()①使用价值是商品的自然属性,而价值是商品的社会属性②使用价 2021-02-17 …