每年，武大、华科等大学都通过面试自主招收学生，并不断有新的学校加入到这一行列。这一新的招生方式在学生中引发了一场讨论。假如你是李华，请根据下表提供的内容给《英语广

Question

每年，武大、华科等大学都通过面试自主招收学生，并不断有新的学校加入到这一行列。这一新的招生方式在学生中引发了一场讨论。假如你是李华，请根据下表提供的内容给《英语广场》编辑写一封信反映讨论情况。
60% 的学生赞成  40%的学生反对
赞成：1．面试可以全面综合地评价一个学生；
2.鼓励学生发展个性和特长；
3．社会需要一种更加开放和有效的录取方式。    
反对：1.面试带有主观性、片面性，可能不公正；
2.并非所有学生都擅于在面试中展示自己；
3.不可能在3-5分钟内评价一个人。
注意： 1.词数：100左右
2.开头已为你写好，不计人总词数。
3. 已给出的信的开关和结尾不得抄入答题卡.
参考词汇：comprehensive综合的，subjective主观的，one-sided片面的，evaluate评价
（以下所给内容不得抄入答题卡）
Dear Editor,
Recently, a discussion has been held in our school on whether it is reasonable for the universities to admit students through interviews. The results are as follows:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer 1

One possible version
60% of the students support this action. They express that interviews can evaluate a student in a more thorough and comprehensive way. It can encourage students to develop their own interests and personalities. What’s more, with the development of society, a more open and efficient way to test a student’s abilities is needed.
On the other hand, the other 40% students are against this idea. They argue that first, interviews may be subjective and one-sided, which could lead to unfairness. Second, not all students are good at showing their talents in interviews. Last but not least, a student can’t be judged in only three or five minutes.

写出两部分人对通过面试自主招收学生的不同观点，同时也可以发表个人观点。