英语强人来啊!帮我翻译!以作参考!要译的请认真译哦!谢谢大家!Notethatneitheroftheseprovisionsreferstounlawfulconductinparticular:onthecontrary,theyappeartocoverprimarilycaseswhere,undertherulesinforcet

Question

英语强人来啊!帮我翻译!以作参考!要译的请认真译哦!谢谢大家!
Note that neither of these provisions refers to unlawful conduct in particular :on the contrary, they appear to cover primarily cases where, under the rules in force the requisitions were perfectly in order. Another point of interest is that the Articles clearly envisage the direct (and speedy) settlement of individual claims, by the armed forces: they represent, in effect, an early attempt to curb the tendency of land armies to “live off the land ”without payment.
不明白是对的，因为这是国际法（法律英语）中一篇文章，节选出其中一段拿出来和大家讨论。。。
谢谢大家的帮助，我再等等，认真看看还有没有更好地！

Answer 1

值得注意的是这两条法规中都没有涉及到非法行为的特殊情况；相反,它们主要含概的只是能够在强制力保证下顺利实施的一般情况.另外很重要的一点是该条款明确表明个人诉讼的直接（快速）的解决方式是依靠武装强制力,即它们明确地表明依靠陆军无偿的援助会是最好的尝试.
最后一句我也没多大把握,你参考参考吧!