帮我搞顶翻译啊Indesigningparkingfacilitiesforpark-and-ridesthegoalistoprovideasinglecontinuouspathforthecommuterfromthestreettoaparkingspaceandtothetransitplatformwithaminimumofconflictingbarriers(seeExhibi

Question

帮我搞顶翻译啊
In designing parking facilities for park-and-rides the goal is to provide a single continuous path for the commuter from the street to a parking space and to the transit platform with a minimum of conflicting barriers (see Exhibit 6.26). Maintaining this goal throughout the design process will provide a convenient and efficient parking facility.
Parking Stall Alignment
Two primary components of parking stall design must be considered when determining the preferred design for a park-and-ride facility: parking angle and bay alignment.
Aligning the parking bay perpendicular to the intermodal transit platform allows pedestrian movement up the aisles to the transit boarding area, minimizing the need to cut between parked automobiles and the likelihood of access impediments such as landscaping. The consideration of parking stall angles will be a primary consideration in choosing a facility circulation pattern.
A number of options are available to the designer in terms of choosing parking angles. The most efficient parking configuration is the right angle or 90-degree parking configuration, as illustrated in Exhibit 6.27. A 90-degree configuration allows for two-way traffic flow between aisles for ease of access, and provides the least complicated pattern for drivers to recognize.
Although a 90-degree layout is clearly advantageous over angled alternatives, there may be specific cases in which angled or even parallel parking should be considered. For instance, if a site is larger than the space required for the projected demand, angled parking can be used, thus requiring more space within the lot and creating an appearance of higher use. When demand increases, the park-and-ride lot can be re-striped, adding additional stalls at a relatively low cost. Another example where angled parking might be advantageous is at the periphery of the lot, where space may be better utilized by an angled configuration.
Access
144
Access for automobile traffic should be separate from the transit entrance to reduce conflicts between the two modes. If a common access point must be used, a transit-only boarding area for transit patrons should still be provided, with automobile traffic directed to the lot via a separate internal lot entrance.
Exhibit 6.26
Preferred Parking Stall Layout

145
Exhibit 6.27
Angled Versus 90o Parking

Because inbound access to the park-and-ride lot is perceived by the user as more critical than outbound movement due to the tendency of patrons to arrive with few minutes to spare, inbound access efficiency should be maximized. However, it is typically in the evening peak that the facility demonstrates the greatest external impacts on the surrounding transportation network because of the large platoons of vehicles trying to leave the park-and-ride lot at the same time (e.g., shortly after a transit vehicle arrives at the lot).

Answer 1

在设计停车处设施为公园和乘坐目标是为通勤者供给一个唯一连续的道路从街道对停车位和对运输平台矛盾的障碍极小值(参见展览6.26) .维护这个目标在设计过程过程中将提供一种方便和高效率的停车处设施.停放的摊位对准线 停车处摊位设计二个主要组分必须被考虑当确定更喜欢的设计为公园和乘坐设施:停车处角度和海湾对准线.排列停车处海湾垂线对intermodal 运输平台允许步行运动走道对运输搭□区域,使需要减到最小切开在停放的汽车和通入障碍之间可能譬如环境美化.停车处摊位角度的考虑将是主要考虑在选择设施循环样式.一定数量的选择供给设计师根据选择停车处角度.最高效率的停车处配置是直角或90 磅停放配置,依照被说明在展览6.27 .90 磅配置考虑到双向运输流量在走道之间为通入舒适,和为司机提供最少复杂的样式认出.虽然90 磅布局清楚地是有利被渔的选择,那里也许是有角度甚至平行的停车处应该被考虑的具体案件.例如,如果站点比空间大的必需为计划的需求,有角度的停车处可能被使用,因而要求更多空间在全部和创造出现之内更高的用途.当需求增加,公园和乘坐全部能是re 镶边,增加另外的摊位在相对地低成本.有角度的停车处也许是有利的是在全部的周围的地方的其它例子,空间也许由一种有角度的配置更好运用.通入 144 访问为交通应该是分别于运输入口减少冲突在二个方式之间.如果一个共同的存取点必须被使用,运输只搭□区域为运输赞助人应该仍然带有,交通被指挥对全部通过一个分开的内部全部入口.展览6.26 更喜欢的停放的摊位布局 145 展览6.27 渔对90o 停车处 由于对的入站通入公园和乘坐全部由用户象重要比向外去运动由于赞助人倾向到达以少量分钟饶恕,入站通入效率应该最大化察觉.但是,典型地是在晚上峰顶,设施展示对周围的运输网络的最巨大的外在冲击由于车大排设法离开同时公园和乘坐全部(即,在运输车之后到达在全部) .